Below are a list of reading materials from sessions in previous academic years.
Previous Seminar Topics – ReproducibiliTEA has been running at Southampton since autumn 2019. Below is the list of previous sessions:
Date – 2021 | Session leads | Theme | Paper |
Thursday 7th October10am – 11am | Pip Grylls | Computational reproducibility | Epistemic Issues in Computational Reproducibility: Software as the Elephant in the Room |
Tuesday 19th October 10am – 12pm | Sophie Hall and Christian Bokhove | Joint Southampton ReproducibiliTea and UKRN meeting | The first hour of this session we discuss the following paper: Barriers to reproducibility: misalignment of career incentives and open science best practicesThe second part of the session will be a UKRN meeting chaired by Christian. All welcome. |
Wednesday 3rd November 10am – 11am | Philly Broadbent | Teaching research transparency | Teaching research transparency in psychological science |
Tuesday 16th November 10am – 11am | Sophie Hall and David Galbraith | Reproducibility and transparency in writing research | Seminar session |
Wednesday 2nd December 10am – 11am | Lucy-Anne Taylor and Philly Broadbent | Open science in archaeology | Open science in archaeology |
TBC | Hayward Godwin | R Markdown session | Seminar session |
16/09/2019 | A Manifesto for reproducible science Reading: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-016-0021 |
01/10/2019 | False Positive Psychology Reading: https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797611417632 |
01/11/2019 | Measuring the Prevalence of Questionable Research Practices with Incentives for Truth Telling Reading: https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797611430953 |
11/11/2019 | Estimating the Reproducibility of Psychological Science Reading: https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aac4716 |
12/12/2019 | Is the Replicability Crisis Overblown? Three Arguments Examined Reading: https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691612463401 |
13/10/2020 | The strengths and costs of being a reproducible researcher Reading: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VcgO2v3JjCU https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2018.11.030 |
28/10/2020 | Does your ten-year-old code still run? Reading: https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-020-02462-7 |
12/11/2020 | Reproducibility practices in industry research & development and collaborative projects |
24/11/2020 | A constructivist perspective on replication in qualitative research Reading: https://osf.io/6efvp/ |
09/12/2020 | Structuring your statistical code |
15/12/2020 | 12 things I wish I knew before Christmas (about reproducibility) |
02/02/2021 | Reproducibility in the natural environment: looking at the reproducibility issues in ecological research Reading: O’Grady (2020) – https://doi.org/10.1126/science.abg0894 |
17/02/2021 | An integrative framework for planning and conducting Non-Interventional, Reproducible, and Open Systematic Reviews (NIRO-SR) Reading: Topor, Pickering et al. (2020) https://osf.io/preprints/metaarxiv/8gu5z |
04/03/2021 | Seven Steps Toward Transparency and Replicability in Psychological Research Reading: Lindsay (2020) – https://onlineacademiccommunity.uvic.ca/lindsaylab/wp-content/uploads/sites/4861/2020/06/Lindsay-RE-Steps-toward-Transparency-1-April-2020-1.pdf |
16/03/2021 | Transparency and reproducibility in artificial intelligence research Reading: Haibe-Kains et al. (2020) – https://arxiv.org/ftp/arxiv/papers/2003/2003.00898.pdf / https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-020-2767-x |
31/03/2021 | Biological variation and reproducibility in lab-based animal experiments. Reading: Voelkl and Würbel (2020) – Biological variation and reproducibility (YouTube) and Voelkl et al. (2020) – https://www.nature.com/articles/s41583-020-0313-3 |
27/04/2021 | How scientists fool themselves and how they can stop. A Psychological perspective on reproducibility.Reading: Nuzzo (2015) – https://www.nature.com/news/how-scientists-fool-themselves-and-how-they-can-stop-1.18517 |
11/05/2021 | UKRN joint session: Reproducibility for ECRs.Reading: llen and Mehler (2019) – https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6513108/ |
26/05/2021 | Checking the reproducibility of your code: CODECHECKReading: Nüst and Eglen (2021) – https://f1000research.com/articles/10-253 |
01/06/2021 | A discussion with journal editors. |
17/06/2021 | Turning the tables: A university league-table based on quality not quantity.Reading: Barnett and Moher (2019) – https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6611132/ |
30/06/2021 | Enhancing reproducibility for computational methodsReading: Stodden et al. (2016) – https://science.sciencemag.org/content/354/6317/1240.long |